Facts The testator had bequeathed both immovable and moveable properties, divided into schedules A, B, C, and D, to his five sons and his wife, X. Schedule A, which contained

Equivalent citations: AIR 1960 ORI 161 Citations- AIR 1960 Ori 161 Bench- R.L. Narasimham, C.J. and S.Barman, J. Appellant- State of Orissa Respondent- Ram Bahadur Thapa Court- Orissa High Court

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(POCSO) Act,[1] was formulated to establish a foolproof framework to protect the children from sexual offences and to provide the clear definition of

CASE NAME- THAKORLAL D VADGAMA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Case No.- Criminal Appeal no. 18 of 1970, decided on May 2, 1973 (From Gujrat High Court) ADVOCATES- For Appellant -

India is a country with its vast coastal area spanning almost 6000 km with more than one-fourth of the total population of the country settled in the coastal areas. Universally

Facts of the case Two destroyers and two cruisers (a squadron) of British warships departed the Corfu port, sailed through a channel in North Corfu Strait that had swept for

Citation: AIR 1995 SC 1531; 1995 SCC (3) 635 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice Kuldip Singh, Justice R.M. Sahai Date of Judgment: May 10, 1995 Facts of the

Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab is a landmark judgment delivered by a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India on August 9, 1980. This case is pivotal in

Case Brief: Manohar Lal Sharma v. Narendra Damodardas Modi & Others[1] [RAFALE CASE] Court: Supreme Court of India Judges- CJI RanjanGogoi, Justice K.M.Joseph, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul Judgement: India Introduction